Essential Year-End Tax Planning Tips for 2024

November 30, 2024 — Sam H. Fawaz

Tax planning becomes essential for individuals and businesses as the year ends. Proactively managing your finances before the calendar flips to 2025 can help minimize your tax burden and set you up for a financially secure new year.

Many clients submit their information yearly to have us optimize their 2024 and future years’ taxes. Proactively estimating and making side-by-side multi-year tax projections has permanently saved some clients thousands of dollars in taxes.

Here are some things to consider as you weigh potential tax moves between now and the end of the year.

1. Consider deferring income to next year

The old rule used to be “defer income.” The new rule is “time income.”

Consider opportunities to defer income to 2025, especially if you may be in a lower tax bracket next year.

For example, you may be able to defer a year-end bonus or delay the collection of business debts, rent, and payments for services. Doing so may enable you to postpone tax payments on the income until next year.

If you have the option to sell real property on a land contract rather than an outright sale, that can spread your tax liability over several years and be subject to a lower long-term capital gain rate (which could be as low as 0%.) On the other hand, if you’re concerned about future tax rate hikes, an outright sale or opting out of the installment method for a land contract sale can ease the uncertainty that you’ll pay higher rates on the deferred income.

If your top tax rate in 2024 is lower than what you expect in 2025 (say, because you are retiring or because of significant gains or a big raise or bonus expected in 2025), it might make sense to accelerate income instead of deferring it.

Be mindful of accelerating or bunching income, which can potentially 1) increase the taxability of social security income, 2) increase Medicare premiums, 3) raise your long-term capital gains rate from 0% to 20%, or 4) decrease your ACA health insurance premium credit.

2. Time your deductions

Once again, the old rule used to be “accelerate deductions.” The new rule is “time deductions.”

If appropriate, look for opportunities to accelerate deductions into the current tax year, especially if your tax rate will be higher this year than next.

If you own a business and are in a high tax bracket, consider accelerating business equipment purchases and electing up to a full expense deduction (via bonus depreciation or Section 179 expensing.)

If you itemize deductions, making payments for deductible expenses such as qualifying interest, state, and local taxes (to the extent they don’t already exceed $10,000), and medical expenses before the end of the year (instead of paying them in early 2025) could make a difference on your 2024 return.

For taxpayers who typically itemize their deductions, the strategy of “bunching” deductions can significantly impact them. Instead of spreading charitable contributions, medical expenses, and other deductible costs across multiple years, consider consolidating them into one year. By “bunching” these deductions, you may exceed the standard deduction threshold and maximize your itemized deductions for the year.

For example, if you typically donate $2,000 annually to charity but are not receiving a tax benefit because you are utilizing the standard deduction, consider making multiple years of contributions in 2024. This could help you exceed the standard deduction amount, allowing you to itemize your deductions and providing more tax benefits (see below.)

For those with significant medical expenses, it’s important to note that only the portion of medical expenses exceeding 7.5% of your adjusted gross income (AGI) can be deducted. If you’re close to reaching that threshold, consider scheduling medical procedures, doctor visits, or purchasing necessary medical equipment before the year ends. Remember that medical expenses are only deductible in the year they are paid, so timing matters.

3. Make deductible charitable contributions

Making charitable donations can reduce your taxable income while supporting causes that matter to you.

If you itemize deductions on your federal income tax return, you can generally deduct charitable contributions, but the deduction is limited to 60%, 50%, 30%, or 20% of your adjusted gross income, depending on the type of property you give and the type of organization to which you contribute. Excess amounts can be carried over for up to five years.

You can use checks or credit cards to make year-end contributions even if the check does not clear until shortly after year-end or the credit card bill does not have to be paid until next year.

As you consider year-end charitable giving, there are a few strategies to keep in mind:

  • Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs): If you’re 70½ or older, you can direct up to $105,000 (2024 limit) from your IRA to a charity as a QCD. This donation counts toward your required minimum distribution (RMD) and is excluded from your taxable income (and can reduce the taxation of social security income.) QCDs cannot be counted as deductible charitable donations.
  • Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs): DAFs allow you to make a significant charitable contribution in 2024 and receive the tax deduction now while deciding which charities to support over the next several years. This is a strategy to help with the bunching of itemized deductions described earlier.
  • Appreciated Stock Donations: Donating appreciated stocks that have been held for over one year instead of cash generally provides a double benefit. It allows you to avoid paying capital gains tax on the appreciation while receiving a charitable deduction equal to the investment’s fair market value.

4. Bump up withholding to cover a tax shortfall

If it looks as though you will owe federal income tax for the year, consider increasing your withholding on Form W-4 for the remainder of the year to cover the shortfall. Time may be limited for employees to request a Form W-4 change and for their employers to implement it in 2024.

The most significant advantage in doing so is that withholding is considered to have been paid evenly throughout the year instead of when the dollars are taken from your paycheck. This approach can help you avoid or reduce possible underpayment of estimated tax penalties.

Those taking distributions from their IRAs can also request that up to 100% of the distribution be paid toward federal and state income tax withholding to help avoid underpayment of estimated tax penalties.

These increased withholding strategies can compensate for low or missing quarterly estimated tax payments.

5. Save more for retirement

Deductible contributions to a traditional IRA and pretax contributions to an employer-sponsored retirement plan such as a 401(k) can reduce your 2024 taxable income. Consider doing so if you still need to contribute up to the maximum amount allowed.

For 2024, you can contribute up to $23,000 to a 401(k) plan ($30,500 if you’re age 50 or older) and up to $7,000 to traditional and Roth IRAs combined ($8,000 if you’re age 50 or older). The window to make 2024 employee contributions to an employer plan generally closes at the end of the year, while you have until April 15, 2025, to make 2024 IRA contributions.

Various income limitations exist for eligibility to make traditional and Roth IRA contributions. Regardless of your income, however, you can make a non-deductible IRA contribution. Such a contribution can be subsequently converted to a Roth IRA at little or no tax cost for many (this is known by many as the “back-door” Roth.) If a Roth IRA conversion doesn’t make sense, the non-deductible contribution adds cost basis to your traditional IRA, reducing future taxation of IRA distributions or Roth conversions. Note that Roth contributions are not deductible and Roth-qualified distributions are not taxable.

Speaking of Roth Conversions, if you expect your tax rate to be higher in future years, or you’re in a low tax bracket in 2024, converting some or all your traditional (pre-tax) IRA or 401(k) funds into a Roth IRA in 2024 may be beneficial. While this conversion triggers taxes now, it can reduce future tax liabilities, as qualified withdrawals from a Roth IRA are tax-free.

Owners of small businesses with retirement plans may have until the due date of their tax returns (plus extensions) to make some retirement plan contributions. Check with your tax advisor for your particular small-business retirement plan.

Some small business retirement plans must be set up by 12/31/2024 to allow for a deduction for the 2024 tax year.

If you have a small business, check with your tax advisor to ensure your retirement plan deductions are correctly balanced with the qualified business income deduction, assuming your small business is eligible.

6. Take required minimum distributions

If you are 73 or older, you generally must take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from traditional IRAs and employer-sponsored retirement plans (special rules may apply if you’re still working and participating in your employer’s retirement plan.)

If you reach 73 in 2024, you must begin taking minimum distributions from your retirement accounts (traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, etc.) by April 1, 2025. However, delaying the 2024 RMD until 2025 will require you to include both the 2024 and 2025 RMDs into 2025 income.

You must make the withdrawals by the required date—the end of the year for most individuals. The penalty for failing to do so is substantial: 25% of any amount you failed to distribute as required (10% if corrected promptly).

In 2024, the IRS finalized somewhat complicated regulations relating to RMDs from inherited IRAs after December 31, 2019.

In general, under the SECURE Act, unless an exception applies, the entire balance of a traditional or Roth IRA must be fully distributed by the end of the 10th year after the year of death.

In addition, depending on the age of the original IRA owner, heirs must take an RMD every year until the 10th year, when the remaining account balance must be distributed. These rules require careful and sometimes complex, multi-year planning for large inherited IRAs, so it’s essential to consult your tax advisor.

Review your accounts to ensure you’ve met your RMD requirement for the year, and if applicable, consider making charitable contributions through a QCD.

7. Weigh year-end investment moves

I often tell folks, “You should not let the tax tail wag the investment dog.” That means that you shouldn’t let tax considerations drive your investment decisions.

With that in mind, lower-income taxpayers may be subject to a 0% long-term capital gains rate for up to about $47K of taxable income for single filers and $94K for joint filers. For “kids” under 26, up to $2,600 of long-term capital gains are taxed at 0% if filed on their own tax returns (not filed with parents’ returns.)

Regardless, it’s worth considering the tax implications of any year-end investment moves that you make. For example, if you have realized net capital gains from selling securities at a profit, you might avoid being taxed on some or all those gains by selling losing positions (also known as tax loss harvesting.)

Any capital losses over and above your capital gains can offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income ($1,500 if your filing status is married filing separately) or be carried forward to reduce your taxes in future years.

Wash sale rules prevent investors from selling an investment at a loss and re-purchasing the same or substantially similar security within 30 days in any of their or spouse’s accounts (including retirement accounts). Doing so invalidates the loss for the current year, and the loss deduction is suspended until the new security is ultimately sold. If you wait 31 days to repurchase the same (or substantially similar security), the wash sale rules do not apply.

Digital assets like Bitcoin are not subject to wash sales rules, so there’s no harm in harvesting a loss and then immediately re-purchasing the same digital asset if desired.

8. Contribute to 529 Education Savings Plans

If you’re planning to save for education expenses, the end of the year is an excellent time to consider contributions to a 529 education savings plan. There is no federal tax deduction for 529 plan contributions, but the account grows tax-free if the funds are used for qualifying educational purposes.

Many states offer a limited tax deduction or credit for 529 plan contributions (some states even allow for a deduction for a 529 plan rollover from another state’s 529 plan.) In many states, contributing to a 529 plan you don’t own (say for a sibling, grandkid, nephew, niece, cousin, or friend) also allows for a state tax deduction.

There’s a five-year “super-funding” strategy for those needing to accelerate their college funding. This strategy allows you to contribute up to five years’ worth of gifts to a 529 plan in a year ($90,000 for individuals, $180,000 for married couples). A gift tax return must be filed, but it may not be taxable if this is the only gift made to that person in the current year. This can be a great way to accelerate your child’s education savings.

With the ability to 1) fund private K-12 education, 2) repay some student loans up to $10,000, and 3) rollover some leftover 529 plan funds to a Roth IRA after college graduation, worries about overfunding a 529 education savings plan are far less than they used to be.

In summary, year-end tax planning is a valuable opportunity to control your finances and reduce your taxable income for the year. Reviewing your financial situation, consulting with your tax advisor, and implementing these year-end strategies will ensure that you enter 2025 knowing you’ve made proactive decisions to optimize your tax savings.

Don’t hesitate to contact us if you would like to discuss a tax plan that fully utilizes all available strategies.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first. If you are not a client, an initial consultation is complimentary, and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client and your financial plan and investment objectives are different.

Posted in General, investing, IRA, markets, tax planning, Taxes. Tags: , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

Real Estate Commissions are about to Change

July 31, 2024 — Sam H. Fawaz

For decades, it’s been a well-known and accepted truism. Anytime you plan to sell your home with the help of a real estate agent, you are expected to pay a 6% commission on the sale. Sure, there have been discount brokers and ways to get your home listed on the Multiple Listing Services (MLS) on the cheap, but deep down, you knew that if you didn’t pay at or near 6%, your property might not get the same attention as others who did.

That’s about to change.

In March 2024, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) reached a landmark $418 million settlement after losing an antitrust lawsuit filed by a group of home sellers. As many as 50 million people who paid commissions on homes sold in recent years could receive a small amount from the class-action settlement. The powerful industry group also agreed to change long-standing practices related to sales commissions. (1)

Background

For decades, many real estate agents have had little choice but to join NAR and follow its rules regarding local MLS — the databases most brokers use to list information about properties for sale. Listing brokers typically cooperated with buyer’s agents and split the commission paid by the seller, with the amounts communicated via the MLS in data fields that were only visible to agents.

Plaintiffs claimed that NAR (and brokers that require agents to be NAR members) conspired to artificially inflate commissions through an industry-wide practice requiring the seller to pay commissions to brokers on both sides of the transaction. They believed this helped to uphold a nationwide standard of five to six percent of the sales price, which is significantly higher than the commissions paid in many other countries. (2)

Practice Changes

Effective August 17, 2024, NAR will implement the following new policies related to how real estate brokers are compensated to handle transactions. (3)

1. Commission offers for buyer’s agents can no longer be required to appear in the MLS, though they are still permitted. Listing agents can advertise specific commission offers on brokerage websites and over the phone, text message, or email. Home sellers and their agents will negotiate directly with buyers and their agents regarding compensation.

2. Buyers must discuss and set compensation directly with their agents before touring homes, as sellers do with listing agents. They will be asked to sign written representation agreements that outline the agents’ services (e.g., showing property, negotiating offers, transaction management) and how much they charge. This is to help ensure that buyers are fully aware of the costs they could be responsible for paying.

Implications for Buyers and Sellers

These changes are intended to allow more room for negotiation and spur competition, which could help lower sellers’ costs. Commissions have always been baked into transaction prices, so home prices would likely be reduced in markets where sellers’ costs fall.

Some economists believe commissions could drop as much as 30% if buyer’s agents face pressure from potential clients to discount their fees, but savings of this magnitude aren’t guaranteed. (4) The impact on real estate commissions will ultimately depend on market conditions, which can vary greatly by location and how sellers, buyers, and agents respond to the new practices.

Like other businesses, brokerages have overhead that includes rent, liability insurance, marketing, and other operating costs. Most individual agents must split sales commissions with their brokers (from about 60/40 up to 80/20 for the most productive agents) or pay fees to the company.

A buyer’s agent sometimes shows property to clients over days to months and may write numerous offers for deals that never come together. Many experienced buyer’s agents — long accustomed to receiving the same commission as the listing agent — may be reluctant to work for less, even if they must justify their value more regularly.

Buyers will determine the commission for their agents, but the money may or may not come from their pockets. For example, an offer could be made contingent on the seller paying the buyer’s share of the commission or include a request for a general credit toward closing costs in the amount needed to pay the buyer’s agent. Current lending guidelines and regulations prevent most buyers from adding commission costs to their mortgages. A rule pertaining to Veterans’ Administration (VA) loans, which specifically prohibited borrowers from paying agent commissions, has been temporarily suspended. (5)

In some cases, sellers might agree to cover buyers’ commissions, as it has long been customary and could still be in their best interests. Nationwide, home prices have risen more than 50% since 2019, and high interest rates have made mortgage payments much less affordable. (6) This means sellers with equity tend to be in a better position to pay commissions than potential buyers, many of whom may struggle to come up with enough cash for the down payment. For these reasons, a seller willing to pay all or some of the buyer’s commission may receive more offers and a higher final price than one who refuses to do so. This assumes, of course, the current cooling of the housing market continues.

Online sites have made it easier to shop for a home without using an agent, so more buyers might brave the market on their own if they think they can pocket the savings. Yet buying a home is the biggest financial transaction many people will make in their lifetimes, and the issues that arise during the process can be unexpected. There are many situations in which buyers could benefit from having their own representation, especially if they are inexperienced or unfamiliar with the local market.

First-time buyers, responsible for 31% of existing home sales in May 2024, may have more confidence and make more informed decisions if they work with a trusted professional. (7) However, many will need help from sellers to pay their agents’ fees, putting them at a bigger disadvantage than ever against buyers with more access to cash in competitive markets.

Negotiating commissions among all parties is likely to make it harder to strike deals in general, so buyers may have to search longer and write more offers before they are successful. It’s also possible that sellers will see little change in commission costs in the coming months while the market is in flux. But in time, the new rules could spark innovation that creates new business models and expands lower-cost options.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other retirement, tax, or financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us at 734-447-5305 or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first. If you are not a client, an initial consultation is complimentary, and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client and your financial plan and investment objectives are different.

1) The Wall Street Journal, March 15, 2024

2, 4) The New York Times, May 10, 2024

3, 5, 7) National Association of Realtors, 2024

6) The Wall Street Journal, June 27, 2024

Posted in investing, real estate. Tags: , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

What You Must Know About the Tax Return Deadline

March 31, 2024 — Sam H. Fawaz

It’s that time of year, folks, and I wish I were talking about spring. The federal income tax filing deadline for individuals is fast approaching—generally Monday, April 15, 2024. For taxpayers living in Maine or Massachusetts, you get a couple of extra days to procrastinate—your deadline is April 17, 2024.

The IRS has also postponed the deadline for certain disaster-area taxpayers to file federal income tax returns and make tax payments. The current list of eligible localities and other details for each disaster are always available on the IRS website’s Tax Relief in Disaster Situations page. Interest and penalties are suspended until the postponed deadline for affected taxpayers.

If I refer to the April 15 deadline in this article, you can assume I also mean any other postponed original deadline that applies to you.

Need More Time?

If you cannot file your federal income tax return by the April (or other) due date, you can file for an extension by the April 15 due date using IRS Form 4868, “Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File U.S. Individual Income Tax Return.” Most software packages can electronically file this form for you and, if necessary, remit a payment.

Filing this extension gives you until October 15, 2024, to file your federal income tax return. You don’t have to explain why you’re asking for the extension, and the IRS will contact you only if your extension is denied and explain the reason(s). There are no allowable extensions beyond October 15 unless extended by law, or you’re affected by a federally declared disaster area.

Assuming you owe a payment on April 15, you can file for an automatic extension electronically without filing Form 4868. Suppose you make an extension payment electronically via IRS Direct Pay or the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS) by April 15. In that case, no extension form has to be filed (see Pay What You Owe below for more information).

An extension of time to file your 2023 calendar year income tax return also extends the time to file Form 709, “Gift and generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax returns” for 2023.

Special rules apply if you’re a U.S. citizen or resident living outside the country or serving in the military outside the country on the regular due date of your federal income tax return. If so, you’re allowed two extra months to file your return and pay any amount due without requesting an extension. Interest, currently at 8% (but not penalties), will still be charged on payments made after the regular due date without regard to the extended due date.

You can pay the tax and file your return or Form 4868 for additional filing time by June 17, 2024. If you request an extension because you were out of the country, check the box on line 8 of the form.

If you file for an extension, you can file your tax return any time before the extension expires. And there’s no need to attach a copy of Form 4868 to your filed income tax return.

Tip #1: By statute, certain federal elections must be made with a timely filed return or extension and cannot be made after the original due date has passed. For example, if you’re a trader and want to elect trader tax status for the current tax year (2024), it must be made by April 15, 2024, with your timely filed return or attached to your extension. Once April 15 has passed, you are barred from making the election until the following tax year. Some elections may be permanently barred after the regular due date, so check with your tax advisor to see if you need a timely filed election with your return or extension.

Tip #2: For proof of a timely snail-mailed extension, especially for those with a relatively large payment, be sure to mail it by certified mail, return receipt requested (always request proof of delivery regardless of the method of transportation.)

Caveat: Generally, the IRS has three years from the original due date of your return to examine it and assess additional taxes (six years if fraud is suspected). If you extend your return, the three (or six) year “clock” does not start ticking until you file it, so essentially, by extending your return, you are extending the statute of limitations. But contrary to popular belief, requesting an extension does NOT increase your odds of an examination.

Pay What You Owe

One of the biggest mistakes you can make is not filing your return because you owe money. If the bottom line on your return shows that you owe tax, file and pay the amount due in full by the due date if possible. If you cannot pay what you owe, file the return (or extension) and pay as much as you can afford. You’ll owe interest and possibly penalties on the unpaid tax, but you will limit the penalties assessed by filing your return on time. You may be able to work with the IRS to pay the unpaid balance via an installment payment agreement (interest applies.)

It’s important to understand that filing for an automatic extension to file your return does not provide additional time to pay your taxes. When you file for an extension, you must estimate the amount of tax you will owe; you should pay this amount (or as much as you can) by the April 15 (or other) filing due date.  If you don’t, you will owe interest, and you may owe penalties as well. If the IRS believes that your estimate of taxes was not reasonable, it may void your extension, potentially causing you to owe failure to file penalties and late payment penalties as well.

There are several alternative ways to pay your taxes besides via check. You can pay online directly from your bank account using Direct Pay or EFTPS, a digital wallet such as Click to Pay, PayPal, Venmo, or cash using a debit or credit card (additional processing fees may apply). You can also pay by phone using the EFTPS or debit or credit card. For more information, go to Make a Payment.

Tax Refunds

The IRS encourages taxpayers seeking tax refunds to file their tax returns as soon as possible. The IRS anticipates most tax refunds being issued within 21 days of the IRS receiving a tax return if 1) the return is filed electronically, 2) the tax refund is delivered via direct deposit, and 3) there are no issues with the tax return. To help minimize delays in processing, the IRS encourages people to avoid paper tax returns whenever possible.

To check on your federal income tax refund status, wait five business days after electronic filing and go to the IRS page: Where’s My Refund? Your state may provide a similar page to look up state refund status.

State and Local Income Tax Returns

Most states and localities have the same April 15 deadline and will conform with postponed federal deadlines due to federally declared disasters or legal holidays. Accordingly, most states and localities will accept your federal extension automatically (to extend your state return) without filing any state extension forms, assuming you don’t owe a balance on the regular due date. Otherwise, your state or locality may have its own extension form you can use to send in with your payment. Most states also now accept electronic payments online instead of a filed extension form with payment. Never assume that a federal extension will extend your state return; some do not. Always check to be sure.

Tip: If you want to cover all your bases, if your federal extension is lost or invalidated for any reason, you may want to file a state paper or online extension to extend the return correctly. It rarely happens, but sometimes, it is better to be safe than sorry.

IRA Contributions

Contributions to an individual retirement account (IRA) for 2023 can be made up to the April 15 due date for filing the 2023 federal income tax return (this deadline cannot be extended except by statute). However, certain disaster-area taxpayers granted relief may have additional time to contribute.

If you had earned income last year, you may be able to contribute up to $6,500 for 2023 ($7,500 for those age 50 or older by December 31, 2023) up until your tax return due date, excluding extensions. For most people, that date is Monday, April 15, 2024.

You can contribute to a traditional IRA, a Roth IRA, or both. Total contributions cannot exceed the annual limit or 100% of your taxable compensation, whichever is less. You may also be able to contribute to an IRA for your spouse for 2023, even if your spouse had no earned income.

Making a last-minute contribution to an IRA may help reduce your 2023 tax bill. In addition to the potential for tax-deductible contributions to a traditional IRA, you may also be able to claim the Saver’s Credit for contributions to a traditional or Roth IRA, depending on your income.

Even if your traditional IRA contribution is not deductible, and you are ineligible for a Roth IRA contribution (because of income limitations), the investment income generated by the contribution becomes tax-deferred, possibly for years, and the contribution builds cost basis in your IRA, making future distributions a little less taxing.

If you make a nondeductible contribution to a traditional IRA and shortly after that convert that contribution to a Roth IRA, you can get around the income limitation of making Roth contributions. This is sometimes called a backdoor Roth IRA. Remember, however, that you’ll need to aggregate all traditional IRAs and SEP/SIMPLE IRAs you own — other than IRAs you’ve inherited — when you calculate the taxable portion of your conversion. If your traditional IRA balance before the non-deductible contribution is zero, then you’ll owe no tax on the conversion, and voila! You have just made a legal Roth IRA contribution.

Making a last-minute contribution to an IRA may help reduce your 2023 tax bill. In addition to the potential for tax-deductible contributions to a traditional IRA, you may also be able to claim the Saver’s Credit for contributions to a traditional or Roth IRA, depending on your income.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other retirement, tax, or financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us at 734-447-5305 or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first. If you are not a client, an initial consultation is complimentary, and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client is different, and so are your financial plan and investment objectives.

Posted in General, tax planning, Taxes. Tags: , , , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

New Retirement Options Starting in 2024

January 31, 2024 — Sam H. Fawaz

The SECURE 2.0 Act, passed in December 2022, made wide-ranging changes to U.S. tax laws related to retirement savings. While some provisions were effective in 2023, others did not take effect until 2024. Here is an overview of some important changes for this year:

Matching student loan payments

Employees who make student loan repayments may receive matching employer contributions to a workplace retirement plan as if the repayments were employee contributions to the plan. This applies to 401(k), 403(b), and government 457(b) plans and SIMPLE IRAs. Employers are not required to make matching contributions in any situation, but this provision allows them to offer student loan repayment matching as an additional benefit to help address the fact that people paying off student loans may struggle to save for retirement.

New early withdrawal exceptions

Withdrawals before age 59½ from tax-deferred accounts, such as IRAs and 401(k) plans, may be subject to a 10% early distribution penalty on top of ordinary income tax. There is a long list of exceptions to this penalty, including two new ones for 2024.

Emergency expenses — one penalty-free distribution of up to $1,000 is allowed in a calendar year for personal or family emergency expenses; no further emergency distributions are allowed during a three-year period unless funds are repaid or new contributions are made that are at least equal to the withdrawal.

Domestic abuse — a penalty-free withdrawal equal to the lesser of $10,000 (indexed for inflation) or 50% of the account value is allowed for an account holder who certifies that he or she has been the victim of domestic abuse during the preceding one-year period.

Emergency savings accounts

Employers can create an emergency savings account linked to a workplace retirement plan for non-highly compensated employees.  Employee contributions are after-tax and can be no more than 3% of salary, up to an account cap of $2,500  (or lower as set by the employer). Employers can match contributions up to the cap, but any matching funds go into the employee’s workplace retirement account.

Clarification for RMD ages

SECURE 2.0 raised the initial age for required minimum distributions (RMDs) from traditional IRAs and most workplace plans from 72 to 73 beginning in 2023 and 75 beginning in 2033. However, the language of the law was confusing. Congress has clarified that age 73 initial RMDs apply to those born from 1951 to 1959, and age 75 applies to those born in 1960 or later. This clarification will be made official in a law correcting a number of technical errors, expected to be passed in early 2024.

No more RMDs from Roth workplace accounts

Under previous law, RMDs did not apply to original owners of Roth IRAs, but they were required from designated Roth accounts in workplace retirement plans. This requirement will be eliminated beginning in 2024.

Transfers from a 529 college savings account to a Roth IRA

Beneficiaries of 529 college savings accounts are sometimes “stuck” with excess funds that they did not use for qualified education expenses. Beginning in 2024, a beneficiary can execute a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer from any 529 account in the beneficiary’s name to a Roth IRA, up to a lifetime limit of $35,000. The 529 account must have been open for more than 15 years. These transfers are subject to Roth IRA annual contribution limits, requiring multiple transfers to use the $35,000 limit. The IRS is still working on specific guidance on this law change, so it might pay to wait a few months before making this type of transfer.

Increased limits for SIMPLE plans

Employers with SIMPLE IRA or SIMPLE 401(k) plans can now make additional nonelective contributions up to the lesser of $5,000 or 10% of an employee’s compensation, provided the contributions are made to each eligible employee in a uniform manner. The limits for elective deferrals and catch-up contributions, which are $16,000 and $3,500, respectively, in 2024, may be increased by an additional 10% for a plan offered by an employer with no more than 25 employees. An employer with 26 to 100 employees may allow higher limits if it provides either a 4% match or a 3% nonelective contribution.

Inflation indexing for QCDs

Qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) allow a taxpayer who is age 70½ or older to distribute up to $100,000 annually from a traditional IRA to a qualified public charity. Such a distribution is not taxable and can be used in lieu of all or part of an RMD. Beginning in 2024, the QCD amount is indexed for inflation, and the 2024 limit is $105,000.

SECURE 2.0 created an opportunity (effective 2023) to use up to $50,000 of one year’s QCD (i.e., one time only) to fund a charitable gift annuity or charitable remainder trust. This amount is also indexed to inflation beginning in 2024, and the limit is $53,000.

Catch-up contributions: indexing, delay, and correction

Beginning in 2024, the limit for catch-up contributions to an IRA for people ages 50 and older will be indexed to inflation, which could provide additional saving opportunities in future years. However, the limit did not change for 2024 and remains $1,000. (The catch-up contribution limit for 401(k)s and similar employer plans was already indexed and is $7,500 in 2024.)

The SECURE 2.0 Act includes a provision — originally effective in 2024 — requiring that catch-up contributions to workplace plans for employees earning more than $145,000 annually must be made on a Roth basis. In August 2023, the IRS announced a two-year “administrative transition period” that effectively delays this provision until 2026. In the same announcement, the IRS affirmed that catch-up contributions in general will be allowed in 2024, despite a change related to this provision that could be interpreted to disallow such contributions. The error will be corrected in the 2024 technical legislation.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other retirement, tax, or financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us at 734-447-5305 or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first. If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary, and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client is different, and so are your financial plan and investment objectives.

Posted in General, retirement planning. Tags: , , , , . Leave a Comment »

What’s Going on in the Markets November 29, 2023

November 29, 2023 — Sam H. Fawaz

Who ya’ gonna believe? The headlines or the market?

The latest economic headlines read:

“Credit Card Defaults are on the rise”
“Household savings rates are at historic lows”
“Banking Credit Contracts to Levels Not Seen Since the Global Financial Crisis”
“Home Builder Confidence from the National Association of Homebuilders takes another sharp drop”
“Trucking Employment is Contracting at a rate not seen since the 2000 and 2008 Crises.”
“The Conference Board of Leading Economic Indicators Declined for the 19th consecutive month”
“Yield Curves are Steepening after being extensively inverted, a sign of recession”
“Overdue commercial property loans hit 10-year high at US banks”
“No End in Sight for the Ukraine-Russia War”
“Could The War in the Middle East be the start of World War 3?”
“World Panics as supply of Twinkies Shrinks” (OK I made that one up to see if you’re paying attention)

With headlines like these, you’d think the stock markets were crashing, and we’re already in a deep recession.

Instead, the markets are having one of their best Novembers in history (after an awful October), which has led to headlines like these:

“The stock market is following a rare pattern that could signal double-digit gains next year”
“Extreme investor bearishness suggests stock market gains of 16% are coming in the next 12 months”
“The S&P 500 could soar more than 20% in the next year after an ultra-rare buy signal just flashed”
“This stock market signal points to the S&P 500 surging 25% within the next year”
“The Dow just flashed a bullish ‘golden cross’ Two days after the bearish ‘death cross’ signal”

High inflation and interest rates, two prominent wars, and unprecedented dichotomies continue to mount throughout the market and the economy, which can only mean that Wall Street’s roller-coaster ride is far from over. Let’s take a closer look at some of the headlines driving the markets.

Leading Economic Indicators

The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Indicator (LEI) has warned of trouble all year. It has declined for 19 consecutive months, its third-longest streak on record. When viewed as a ratio with the Conference Board’s Coincident Economic Indicator (CEI), declines from peaks have typically led to recessions. When decreasing, this ratio provides evidence that coincident indicators are holding up, but leading indicators are deteriorating. The Leading-to-Coincident Ratio has steeply declined since its peak in December 2021. Never has this ratio fallen this far and at such a rapid rate without a corresponding recession.

Treasury Yields

Another warning sign still flashing red and has a near-perfect track record for predicting recessions is the yield spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasurys.

Typically, one would expect to receive a higher interest rate on longer-duration bonds, CDs, debt, etc. After all, the more time a debt is outstanding, the more risk the lender takes (e.g., default risk, interest rate risk, bankruptcy, death, etc.). 10-year Treasurys should normally pay a higher interest rate than 2-year Treasurys to compensate lenders (the public) for this added risk.

An inversion means shorter-duration Treasurys command a higher interest rate than longer-duration Treasurys. Historically, inversions are unusual and indicate the economy is vulnerable. After all, if you’re concerned about the economy, it means you’re concerned about corporations being able to pay back their debt. Hence, you’re more likely to buy shorter-term debt. That pushes shorter-term interest rates into inversion. Simply put, if you had concerns about your brother-in-law paying back a personal loan, you’re more likely to keep the term shorter rather than longer, right?

The most recent inversion of the 10-year treasury bill and the 2-year treasury bill interest rates began in July of 2022 and quickly became its deepest (widest) since the early 1980s. The initial inversion is an early warning sign of a potential oncoming recession, but when this yield spread moves back above 0.0 (or it un-inverts), historically, there are four months on average before the onset of a recession. So, this is another definite recession warning sign.

Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Economic Indicators

A few macroeconomic indicators bounced back from dire levels or improved earlier this year, spurring hopes of a soft landing. However, unfortunately, many of these improvements have recently reversed course.

The ISM manufacturing index, also known as the purchasing managers’ index (PMI), is a monthly indicator of U.S. economic activity based on a survey of purchasing managers at more than 300 manufacturing firms. It is a key indicator of the state of the U.S. economy. The PMI measures the change in production levels across the U.S. economy from month to month. The PMI report is released on the first business day of each month.

The 50 level in the PMI (both manufacturing and services) is the demarcation between economic expansion and contraction. Above 50, it’s expanding; below 50, it’s contracting.

Late last year, the ISM Manufacturing PMI index fell into contraction territory (<50.0) and has yet to move back into expansion. It has contracted for 12 consecutive months, showing some improvement mid-year before dropping once again in October.

The ISM Non-Manufacturing (or services) Index is an economic index based on surveys of more than 400 non-manufacturing (or services) firms’ purchasing and supply executives. The ISM Services PMI comes out in the first week of each month and provides a detailed view of the U.S. economy from a non-manufacturing standpoint.

The ISM Services Index has been resilient this year, dropping below 50.0 just once since the pandemic. After initially improving in early 2023, it has declined for the past two months and is now at a five-month low. Because more than 70% of the economy is services-based, any contraction would not benefit the whole economy.

Housing and Real Estate

Housing, another major economic sector, accounts for 15-18% of U.S. GDP and is also on somewhat of a roller coaster ride of its own. Despite its improvement earlier this year, home sales have retracted and are at their lowest levels since 2010.

Existing home sales, which comprise most of the housing market, decreased 4.1% in October 2023 from the level in September to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.79 million, the lowest rate since August 2010, according to the National Association of Realtors. October sales fell 14.6% from a year earlier.

New home sales for October came in lower than expected at 679,000, lower than September’s surprise of 759,000 but slightly higher than August’s 675,000. Despite being below expectations, these numbers are pretty robust (not surprising, given that existing homeowners with low mortgage rates are not selling).

Today’s housing market is still one of the most unaffordable in U.S. history. Home prices have exceeded the extremes of the 2005 housing bubble peak. With today’s high mortgage rates, high home prices, and ever-increasing ownership costs, housing activity seems to be at a standstill overall. Continued declines in home sales would hint at a bursting housing bubble.

On November 8, the Financial Times reported that overdue commercial property loans hit a 10-year high at U.S. banks. The Federal Reserve’s hiking campaign to curb inflation has caused borrowing costs of all types to surge this year, including in commercial real estate. Combined with empty building space from the pandemic work-from-home trend, commercial real estate is in a tight spot. The Green Street Commercial Property Price Index is now down nearly 20% from its 2022 peak and back to a level not seen since the short COVID-induced recession in 2020.

Inflation

While commercial property prices have fallen, price pressures elsewhere have reaccelerated in recent months, prompting consumers to expect inflation to remain elevated in the months ahead. After all, how many items at the grocery or department store have you seen come down in price (besides perhaps eggs and gasoline?)

For October, while headline and Core Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) improved slightly (inflation down), the recent acceleration in consumer inflation expectations indicates that this improvement could be temporary.

In consumer sentiment surveys, the first half of this year saw consumers growing more optimistic about the economy as inflation slowed; however, expectations of future inflation have surged since then, and consumers are becoming discouraged again. Discouraged consumers turn into non-confident consumers who tend to put away their wallets and walk away from discretionary purchases.

Since September, consumer expectations of higher inflation in 12 months have increased significantly to 4.4%. Meanwhile, inflation expectations in five years reached 3.2% as of October’s interim report, their highest level in over a decade. Despite the recent easing in the CPI data, this inflationary expectation pressures the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates elevated.

Inflation expectations notwithstanding, consumers have enthusiastically supported the economy this year despite inflationary challenges. However, the upward trend in credit card delinquency rates indicates an increasingly stressed consumer. Figures from the Federal Reserve show that credit card delinquencies have risen to 2011 levels, and delinquent auto loans are at their highest since 2010. Though not at the extreme levels seen during the Great Financial Crisis (2007-2009), these delinquencies are not slowing and could quickly surge higher if stronger parts of the economy begin to falter.

Jobs

Employment continues to be the last bastion of strength in today’s economy and is important to watch. Jobs remain plentiful, and employees increasingly view employment as transactional (as opposed to long-term). While the unemployment rate remains at historic lows, it has trended upward recently, which could become worrisome.

The unemployment rate in October clocked in at 3.9%, quite low by historical standards but 0.5 percentage points higher than the low rate we saw earlier this year (3.4%).  Increases in the unemployment rate of at least 0.6 percentage points from a cyclical low have confirmed the onset of nearly every recession of the past 50 years, with only one false signal in 1959. Accordingly, the unemployment rate is now just 0.1 percentage points away from reaching this threshold, which would confirm the onset of a recession. The November monthly jobs report and the unemployment rate are scheduled to be released on Friday, December 8.

The Stock Markets: What? Me Worry?

Since the start of November, the S&P 500 Index has been up about 8.5%. The tech-heavy NASDAQ index is up about 10.8%.

Rocket-boosted by the Magnificent Seven tech stocks (Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla), the indexes would not be anywhere nearly as strong without them. While the combined seven stocks are up about 80% year-to-date, the other 493 stocks in the S&P 500 Index are flat. While historically, a handful of stocks “carry” the indexes, we usually see better performance from the rest, and we’re largely not seeing that. Lately, the rally is showing signs of slowly broadening out, which is a good sign going into year’s end.

If you look at the S&P 500 Index on an equal-weight basis (where each stock has an equal “vote,” as opposed to a weighted approach based on company size), the index would be up only 3.8% year-to-date. The Mid-cap 400 index is also up 3.8% year-to-date, and the Small Cap 600 is up 3.3%.

Since we’re in the 4th quarter of a pre-election year, the markets have two reasons to be seasonally positive. True to form, November has reclaimed most of the losses from August to October and looks poised to take out the July high in December. As long as the S&P 500 Index holds the 4400 level, things look good. Daily new high prices among stocks that outnumber new low prices are also encouraging and add to the rally’s strength.

My main concern is with the valuation of the Magnificent Seven Stocks. Compared with the Nifty Fifty Stocks in 1972 and the Tech bubble in 2000, these seven stocks are just as overvalued. Momentum trading combined with valuations this extreme can turn great companies into terrible investments, so buyers at these levels should beware. Should the drive to buy anything related to AI (Artificial Intelligence) cool off in 2024, these seven stocks will have a disproportionate effect on the indexes, driving down the markets quickly, especially since so many portfolio managers have piled into them as “safe havens.” I’m not saying to sell them now, but if you’re overexposed to them and have enjoyed the ride, it would be prudent to trim them at their current levels (this is not a recommendation to buy or sell.)

Recession Watch

A strong consumer, robust labor market, the housing wealth effect, and the lasting effects of a zero interest rate policy held in place too long have made 2023 recession callers look foolish (including me).

Underestimating the U.S. Consumer has always been a bad bet, especially when locked down for months, saving their stimulus checks and unspent wages and ultimately coming out of the gates splurging. While their savings are nearly depleted, I would not completely count them out just yet, and a recession in 2024 is definitely not a sure thing, although I still believe we will have one next year.

As discussed above, there are signs that the post-pandemic fiscal and monetary drugs are starting to wear off for the world’s economies, and a hangover might be on the horizon. Whether and when that hangover turns gross domestic product in a negative direction and, therefore, an economic recession, is anyone’s guess. I like what Bloomberg Points of Return writer John Authers wrote this week on that topic:

“…Having got this far, there’s now a pretty good chance the US can get through the next two years without a recession. But the odds still point more to a downturn. That explains the negativity in opinion polls and surveys of consumers, even if it completely fails to explain the enthusiasm among consumers when they go shopping. And then there’s the issue of stock market sentiment, which is utterly baffling.”

It would be understandable to read this post and think that things look grim and that it’s time to batten down the hatches and sell everything. It’s not. When it comes to discounting the future, the markets usually have it right (looking out 6-9 months), and we may just be experiencing some economic indigestion that will resolve itself, and the stock markets will challenge and exceed the all-time highs in 2024.

Election years are positive for a reason: the incumbents want to be re-elected, so you can’t underestimate the levers they can pull to keep the economy firing on all cylinders and postpone any recession until a later year. Never underestimate what determined politicians can do.

I would like to take this opportunity to wish your family and you a very happy holiday season.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client, an initial consultation is complimentary, and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client is different, and so are your financial plan and investment objectives.

Source: InvesTech Research

Posted in American Economy, General, Stock Market. Tags: , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

What’s Going on in the Markets January 7 2016

January 7, 2016 — Sam H. Fawaz

Have your long-term financial goals changed in the last four days?

Are American companies becoming less valuable because investors in China are panicking?

Is there any reason to think that because Chinese investors are panicking, that Chinese companies are less valuable today than they were a few days ago?

These are the kinds of questions to ponder as you watch the U.S. stock market catch a cold after China sneezed.  In each of the first four trading days of the year, China closed its markets due to a rapid fall in share prices—a move which may have made the panic worse, since it made investors fear being trapped in stocks that are seen as dropping in value.  It’s unclear exactly how or why, but the panic spread to global markets, with U.S. stocks falling 4.9% to mark the worst first-of-the-year drop in history.

For long-term investors, the result is much the same as if you went to the grocery store and discovered that the prices had fallen roughly 5% across the board.  At first, you might think this is a great bargain. But then you might wonder whether the prices will be even lower tomorrow or next week.  One thing you probably WOULDN’T worry about is whether prices will eventually go back up; you know they always have in the past after these sale events expire.

Will they?  The truth is, nobody knows—and if you see pundits on TV say with certainty that they know where the markets are going, your first impulse should be to laugh, and your second should be to check their track record for predicting the future.  Without a working crystal ball, it’s hard to know whether the markets are entering a correction phase which will make stocks even cheaper to buy, or whether people will wake up and realize that they don’t have to share the panic of Chinese investors on this side of the ocean.  The good news is there appears to be no major economic disruption like the Wall Street derivatives mess that triggered the 2008 downturn.  The best, sanest investors will once again watch the markets for entertainment purposes—or just turn the channel.

I overwhelmingly hear pundits predicting a bear market in 2016 (a bear market is defined as a 20% or more decline from the last market peak). “The bull market has gone on way too long, economic data is deteriorating, the Federal Reserve is raising interest rates, geopolitical events spell doom, we’re heading for a recession, oil is going to $1 per barrel” are all reasons our markets are headed for a tumble. Remind yourself that no one knows for sure what might happen, and while a bear market might assert itself in 2016, no one can reliably predict when it will come. All we know for certain is that it sets up opportunities

So what should you do? If you’ve enjoyed nice gains in your portfolio from this bull market, then you should consider cashing in some of those gains. It never hurts to take some money “off the table” and have some cash reserves to take advantage of better prices. Don’t panic sell–wait for the inevitable bounce that always comes after a multi-day selloff. You’ll be glad you did.

If you’d rather not tax the tax hit on your gains, there are ways to hedge your portfolio so you can at least sleep better at night. Speaking of that, if you’re up at night worrying about your portfolio, then you need to figure out whether you’ve taken on too much risk for your temperament and investing time horizon. You should first discuss all of this with your financial advisor/planner. Don’t have one? We’re glad to help.

As for our clients, we’ve been raising cash and doing some hedging ourselves over the past year. While there are some concerning recent economic trends and technical market anomalies, we don’t see signs of an impending recession on the horizon. We look for indications of a recession, because recessions usually lead to bear markets.

Nothing in this note should be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Sources:

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/f248931e-b4e5-11e5-8358-9a82b43f6b2f.html#axzz3wc533ghn

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bc8c0d60-b54d-11e5-b147-e5e5bba42e51.html?ftcamp=published_links%2Frss%2Fhome_us%2Ffeed%2F%2Fproduct#axzz3wc533ghn

The MoneyGeek thanks guest writer Bob Veres for his contribution to this post

Posted in Financial Planning, General, retirement planning, Stock Market. Tags: , , , . Leave a Comment »

How Do the Markets Really Work?

December 21, 2014 — Sam H. Fawaz

We all do it.  But what do we really know about investing?  A recent post about investing wisdom features a lot of interesting (and often overlooked) facts and figures, plus some insights from Warren Buffett, Jeremy Siegel, William Bernstein, Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman and a few economists you may have heard of.

Regarding market predictions, the post had this to say: The phrase “double-dip recession” was mentioned 10.8 million times in 2010 and 2011, according to Google. It never came. There were virtually no mentions of “financial collapse” in 2006 and 2007. It did come. A similar story can be told virtually every year.

According to Bloomberg, the 50 stocks in the S&P 500 that Wall Street rated the lowest at the end of 2011 outperformed the overall index by 7 percentage points over the following year.

Many of the items offered insight into how our investment markets actually work.  For instance:

  • Since 1871, the market has spent 40% of all years either rising or falling more than 20%. Roaring booms and crushing busts are perfectly normal.
  • Apple increased more than 6,000% from 2002 to 2012, but declined on 48% of all trading days during that time period. (Investing is never a straight path up.)
  • Polls show Americans for the last 25 years have said the economy is in a state of decline. Pessimism in the face of advancement is the norm.
  • A broad index of U.S. stocks increased 2,000-fold between 1928 and 2013, but lost at least 20% of its value 20 times during that period. People would be less scared of volatility if they knew how common it was.
  • There were 272 automobile companies in 1909. Through consolidation and failure, three emerged on top, two of which went bankrupt. Spotting a promising trend and identifying a winning investment are two different things.
  • According to economist Tim Duy, “As long as people have babies, as long as capital depreciates, technology evolves, and tastes and preferences change, there is a powerful underlying impetus for growth that is almost certain to reveal itself in any reasonably well-managed economy.”

The post had a few zingers about some of the best-paid executives in the financial and investment community:

  • Twenty-five hedge fund managers took home $21.2 billion in 2013 for delivering an average performance of 9.1%, versus the 32.4% you could have made in an index fund. Hedge funds are a great business to work in — not so much to invest in.
  • In 1989, the CEOs of the seven largest U.S. banks earned an average of 100 times what a typical household made. By 2007, that had risen to more than 500 times. By 2008, several of those banks no longer existed.

And finally, if you want to understand the difference between daily fluctuation and the underlying growth of value in the markets, consider this:

Investor Ralph Wagoner once explained how markets work, recalled by Bill Bernstein: “He likens the market to an excitable dog on a very long leash in New York City, darting randomly in every direction. The dog’s owner is walking from Columbus Circle, through Central Park, to the Metropolitan Museum. At any one moment, there is no predicting which way the pooch will lurch. But in the long run, you know he’s heading northeast at an average speed of three miles per hour. What is astonishing is that almost all of the market players, big and small, seem to have their eye on the dog, and not the owner.”

If you would like to discuss your current portfolio or any financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Source:

http://www.businessinsider.com/things-everyone-should-know-about-investing-and-the-economy-2014-12

Posted in Financial Planning, General, investing, markets. Tags: , , , , . Leave a Comment »

Investor Know Thyself

December 10, 2014 — Sam H. Fawaz

In an ideal world, emotions would play a very small role in the way people invest and manage their money. Everyone would thoroughly research their options, maintain realistic expectations, and keep counterproductive habits under control.

But in the real world, even well-informed investors sometimes make emotionally charged decisions that may threaten their ability to stay focused on important financial goals, such as accumulating enough money for retirement. In fact, such missteps are so common that many academics have done extensive research on “investor psychology” or “behavioral finance” to explain why some people tend to keep encountering the same obstacles in their financial lives.

Behavior Insights

As you might imagine, different financial attitudes can result in very different consequences. For example, the behavior known as “anchoring” is the tendency for investors to hold on to a belief based on their own limited experience, despite the availability of contradictory information.

For instance, someone who lived through the Great Depression might be more likely to be a conservative investor, while someone who did very well in the market during the 1990s might tend to be a more aggressive investor. Of course, history shows that that type of decline or growth experienced by such individuals, is more the exception than the norm. As such, one possible result of anchoring is making long-term investment decisions based on misguided performance expectations or incomplete facts.

Overconfidence in one’s own abilities is another mindset that could make it more difficult to achieve lasting financial security. Why? Because it may lead investors to ignore sound advice, misunderstand goals, and potentially implement inappropriate investment strategies. On the other hand, a lack of confidence may be to blame for the “fear of loss” (or “fear of regret”) that causes some nervous investors to adjust their portfolios too often — or not often enough.

You’ve Got Personality

It can also be insightful to think about what type of “financial personality” you have. “Impulsives,” for example, are prone to spending spontaneously and not saving enough. “Planners,” however, are in the habit of setting aside as much as possible and sticking to an appropriate investment strategy.

If you would like to discuss your financial personality or any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Posted in Fee-only, Financial Planning, General, investing. Tags: , , . 1 Comment »

Why Losses Really Do Matter

October 28, 2014 — Sam H. Fawaz

Everybody who told us that the steep market drops earlier this month wouldn’t last can rightly claim they’re right.  When the S&P 500 was down 7.4% during a two-week sell off, there was no way to know whether we’d have to endure more of the same.  Staying the course turned out to be exactly the right strategy, but that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be concerned about downside risk.  In fact, during the downturn, all of us should have been working hard to keep our portfolios from falling as far and as fast as the American indices.

Isn’t this a contradiction?  There is no contradiction between holding on during market downturns and building portfolios that are unlikely to keep pace with a bear market free-fall.  You hold on because no living person knows when the stock markets will recover, but history tells us that they always do seem to recover and eventually deliver returns that are higher, on average, than the returns you get when the money is safely stored under your mattress.

But you also pay attention to downturns because the further your portfolio falls, the harder it is to recover.  There’s actually a rational reason why you tend to fear losses more than you enjoy your gains.

The mathematics show the asymmetrical effect of losses vs. gains.  If your $1 million portfolio loses 10%, falling to $900,000, then it requires an 11.11% gain to get you back where you started.  It doesn’t seem fair, but that’s how it is.  A 20% loss requires a 25% gain, and if your portfolio were to drop 40%, you’d need a subsequent 66.67% gain to climb back to your original $1 million nest egg.

Chances are, you know how we fortify portfolios against losses: we include a variety of different types of assets–including bonds which, against every single market prediction at the start of the year, are actually delivering positive returns almost all the way across the maturity spectrum.  We include foreign stocks, which haven’t exactly been knocking the lights out this year, but which will, someday, offer strong gains when the U.S. markets are weakening.  Also, we take profits on positions that have reached their price targets and hedge portfolios with inverse funds.  All of these different movements tend to have a calming effect on the portfolio’s returns, not always in every circumstance, but fairly reliably over time.

The result?  A smoother ride puts more money in your pocket.  If an investor experienced returns of +20% and -10% in alternate years over the next 20 years, a $100,000 portfolio would grow to just under $216,000.  If a more diversified investor experienced a smoother ride of 10% a year, her portfolio would grow to just under $673,000.  The power of steady compounding is a marvelous thing to see.  The drag of losses can be debilitating to a portfolio’s growth.

You won’t experience either of those trajectories exactly, of course.  But if you can somehow avoid the worst of the market’s falls, even if it means never beating the market during the up-cycles, you raise your chances of long-term success.  If you can do this and remain invested through a lot of uncertainty, like we experienced earlier this month, chances are you’ll enjoy better long-term returns than a lot of the “experts” you see screaming at you to buy or sell on the cable finance channels.

Oh, and that 7.4% drop?  The S&P 500 has to go up 8% to recover the ground it lost in that two-week period.  As of today, we’ve recovered that entire loss.

Posted in General. Tags: , , , . Leave a Comment »

Evidence for Time Diversification

September 1, 2014 — Sam H. Fawaz

One area where many professional advisors disagree with academics is whether stock investments tend to become less risky as you go out in time. Advisors say that the longer you hold stocks, the more the ups and downs tend to cancel each other out, so you end up with a smaller band of outcomes than you get in any one, two or five year period. Academics beg to disagree. They have argued that, just as it is possible to flip a coin and get 20 consecutive “heads” or “tails,” so too can an unlucky investor get a 20-year sequence of returns that crams together a series of difficult years into one unending parade of losses, something like 1917 (-18.62%), 2000 (-9.1%), 1907 (-24.21%), 2008 (-37.22%), 1876 (-14.15%), 1941 (-9.09%), 1974 (-26.95%), 1946 (-12.05%), 2002 (-22.27%), 1931 (-44.20%), 1940 (-8.91%), 1884 (-12.32%), 1920 (-13.95%), 1973 (-15.03%), 1903 (-17.09%), 1966 (-10.36%), 1930 (-22.72%), 2001 (-11.98%), 1893 (-18.79%), and 1957 (-9.30%).

Based purely on U.S. data, the professional advisors seem to be getting the better of the debate, as you can see in the below chart, which shows rolling returns from 1973 through mid-2009.

dd342ee2-d38b-40ef-b622-583f11f0b02c

The outcomes in any one year have been frighteningly hard to predict, ranging anywhere from a 60% gain to a 40% loss. But if you hold that stock portfolio for three years, the best and worst are less dramatic than the best and worst returns over one year, and the returns are flattening out gradually over 10, 15 and 20 years. No 20-year time period in this study showed a negative annual rate of return.

But this is a fairly limited data set. What happens if you look at other countries and extend this research over longer time periods? This is exactly what David Blanchett at Morningstar, Michael Finke at Texas Tech University and Wade Pfau at the American College did in a new paper, as yet unpublished, which you can find here:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2320828.

The authors examined real (inflation-adjusted) historical return patterns for stocks, bonds and cash in 20 industrialized countries, each over a 113-year time period. The sample size thus represents 2,260 return years, and the authors parsed the data by individual time periods and a variety of rolling time periods, which certainly expands the sample size beyond 87 years of U.S. market behavior.

What did they find? Looking at investors with different propensities for risk, they found that in general, people experienced less risk holding more stocks over longer time periods. The only exceptions were short periods of time for investors in Italy and Australia. The effect of time-dampened returns was particularly robust in the United Kingdom, Japan, Denmark, Austria, New Zealand, South Africa and the U.S.

Overall, the authors found that a timid investor with a long-term time horizon should increase his/her equity allocation by about 2.7% for each year of that time horizon, from whatever the optimal allocation would have been for one year. The adventurous investor with low risk aversion should raise equity allocation by 1.3% a year. If that sounds backwards, consider that the timid investor started out with a much lower stock allocation than the dare-devil investor–what the authors call the “intercept” of the Y axis where the slope begins.

Does that mean that returns in the future are guaranteed to follow this pattern? Of course not. But there seems to be some mechanism that brings security prices back to some kind of “normal” long-term return. It could be explained by the fact that investors tend to be more risk-averse when valuations (represented by the P/E ratios) are most attractive (when stocks, in other words, are on sale, but investors are smarting from recent market losses), and most tolerant of risk during the later stages of bull markets (when people are sitting on significant gains). In other words, market sentiment seems to view the future opportunity backwards.

Is it possible that stocks are not really fairly priced at all times, but instead are constantly fluctuating above and below some hard-to-discern “true” or “intrinsic” value, which is rising far more steadily below the waves? That underlying growth would represent the long-term geometric investment return, more or less–or, at least, it might have a relationship with it that is not well-explored. The old saw that stocks eventually return to their real values, that the market, long-term, is a weighing machine, might be valid after all.

If you have any questions about financial or investment planning and management, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.

Posted in investing, retirement. Tags: , , , . Leave a Comment »
« Older posts
Newer posts »