Market & Economic Summary for the Week Ended January 3, 2025

January 4, 2025 — Sam H. Fawaz

In another volatile holiday-shortened week, the S&P 500 index closed 0.5% lower as the euphoric end-of-year rally lost all momentum. The NASDAQ index closed down 0.75%, while the small capitalization stocks finally showed some strength and closed up 0.9%. The traditional year-end Santa Claus rally was MIA as more signs of institutional distribution (selling) emerged.

The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) Purchasing Managers (PMI) Index (1) for Manufacturing came in at 49.3%, just 0.9 percentage points higher than November’s reading but still in contraction. While manufacturing is still in contraction overall, it is moving slower. Additionally, the New Orders Index improved in December.

However, the report also showed that the Employment Index decreased and fell deeper into contraction while the Prices Index rose and grew faster. If manufacturing employment continues to decline while prices climb and overall contraction persists, even an increase in new orders may not keep the manufacturing sector afloat.

Pending Home Sales (2) from the National Association of Realtors increased by 2.2%, suggesting buyers may no longer be willing to wait for lower mortgage rates. The 30-year fixed rate is still increasing and nearing 7%.

The 20-City Adjusted Case-Shiller Home Price Index for October was up 0.3% versus September (4.2% year over year), slightly higher than expected.

Monitoring additional housing metrics in the coming weeks will be essential to gauge the housing market’s health in 2025.

Weekly jobless claims came in at 211,000, lower than expectations for 225,000, showing continued stability. This data tends to be volatile around the holidays.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics will release its monthly jobs report for December on Friday, January 10.

YDream Financial Services is an investment advisory and financial planning firm serving the entire United States. If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first. If you are not a client, an initial consultation is complimentary, and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client and your financial plan and investment objectives are different.

(1) The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI), released on the first business day of each month for the previous month, surveys purchasing and supply executives around the country on new orders, production, employment, and much more. Manufacturing supply executives are polled on their view of the current economic climate concerning their respective businesses. The ISM Manufacturing PMI is a diffusion index – “they have properties of leading indicators and are convenient summary measures showing the prevailing direction of change and the scope of change.” A reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing economy is generally expanding, while a reading below 50 percent indicates that it is typically declining. The ISM Manufacturing PMI is considered a highly reliable gauge of current business conditions for the manufacturing sector.

(2) The Pending Home Sales Index from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) is a leading indicator for the housing sector based on pending sales of existing homes. A sale is pending if a contract has been signed but has not yet closed. Typically, these sales close within two months of a contract signing.

Source: InvesTech Research

Posted in American Economy, economy, Financial Planning, investing, markets, Stock Market, US Stock Market. Tags: , , , , . Leave a Comment »

Markets & Macroeconomic Summary for the Week Ended December 27, 2024

December 29, 2024 — Sam H. Fawaz

The S&P 500 index closed 0.65% higher in a volatile, shortened holiday trading week. The NASDAQ index gained 0.75%, while the small caps were slightly positive, up 0.21%. The Microcap index outperformed for the week, bouncing up 1.3%. Additional signs of bearish distribution appeared this week.

Another holiday-shortened trading week is ahead, with the stock markets closed on New Year’s Day. Whether Santa can right his sleigh and deliver further gains in his traditional year-end rally remains to be seen.

Durable Goods, a volatile data series, was better than expected. It showed that new orders for key U.S.-manufactured capital goods surged in November, up 0.7%, amid strong demand for machinery. However, new orders were down 1.1% month-over-month, missing expectations.

The Conference Board’s consumer confidence reading was down from last month’s reading and notably lower than forecast. The Present Situation and Expectations Indexes fell, with the Expectations Index just slightly above the Conference Board’s 80.0 “recession threshold.” This was surprising given the renewed post-election euphoria and optimism expected to continue.

While only a single monthly data point, it is surprising that the post-election rebound in Consumer Confidence was not sustained. If consumer attitudes continue to sour and spending slows dramatically, it can significantly impact the stock market and economy in 2025.

New Home Sales from the Census Bureau were up 5.9% in November. Sales rose despite decades-high mortgage rates, mainly due to a drop in the median sales price, which saw its lowest price tag since February 2022. New home inventory was down slightly and represents a supply of 8.9 months at current prices.

Key housing-related stocks have continued to suffer due to rising interest rates. The 30-year mortgage rate from Freddie Mac rose to 6.9% this week, notably higher than its interim low of 6.1% in late September. Continued housing weakness could also indicate impending economic and stock market weakness.

Source: InvesTech Research

Posted in American Economy, General, markets. Tags: , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

Essential Year-End Tax Planning Tips for 2024

November 30, 2024 — Sam H. Fawaz

Tax planning becomes essential for individuals and businesses as the year ends. Proactively managing your finances before the calendar flips to 2025 can help minimize your tax burden and set you up for a financially secure new year.

Many clients submit their information yearly to have us optimize their 2024 and future years’ taxes. Proactively estimating and making side-by-side multi-year tax projections has permanently saved some clients thousands of dollars in taxes.

Here are some things to consider as you weigh potential tax moves between now and the end of the year.

1. Consider deferring income to next year

The old rule used to be “defer income.” The new rule is “time income.”

Consider opportunities to defer income to 2025, especially if you may be in a lower tax bracket next year.

For example, you may be able to defer a year-end bonus or delay the collection of business debts, rent, and payments for services. Doing so may enable you to postpone tax payments on the income until next year.

If you have the option to sell real property on a land contract rather than an outright sale, that can spread your tax liability over several years and be subject to a lower long-term capital gain rate (which could be as low as 0%.) On the other hand, if you’re concerned about future tax rate hikes, an outright sale or opting out of the installment method for a land contract sale can ease the uncertainty that you’ll pay higher rates on the deferred income.

If your top tax rate in 2024 is lower than what you expect in 2025 (say, because you are retiring or because of significant gains or a big raise or bonus expected in 2025), it might make sense to accelerate income instead of deferring it.

Be mindful of accelerating or bunching income, which can potentially 1) increase the taxability of social security income, 2) increase Medicare premiums, 3) raise your long-term capital gains rate from 0% to 20%, or 4) decrease your ACA health insurance premium credit.

2. Time your deductions

Once again, the old rule used to be “accelerate deductions.” The new rule is “time deductions.”

If appropriate, look for opportunities to accelerate deductions into the current tax year, especially if your tax rate will be higher this year than next.

If you own a business and are in a high tax bracket, consider accelerating business equipment purchases and electing up to a full expense deduction (via bonus depreciation or Section 179 expensing.)

If you itemize deductions, making payments for deductible expenses such as qualifying interest, state, and local taxes (to the extent they don’t already exceed $10,000), and medical expenses before the end of the year (instead of paying them in early 2025) could make a difference on your 2024 return.

For taxpayers who typically itemize their deductions, the strategy of “bunching” deductions can significantly impact them. Instead of spreading charitable contributions, medical expenses, and other deductible costs across multiple years, consider consolidating them into one year. By “bunching” these deductions, you may exceed the standard deduction threshold and maximize your itemized deductions for the year.

For example, if you typically donate $2,000 annually to charity but are not receiving a tax benefit because you are utilizing the standard deduction, consider making multiple years of contributions in 2024. This could help you exceed the standard deduction amount, allowing you to itemize your deductions and providing more tax benefits (see below.)

For those with significant medical expenses, it’s important to note that only the portion of medical expenses exceeding 7.5% of your adjusted gross income (AGI) can be deducted. If you’re close to reaching that threshold, consider scheduling medical procedures, doctor visits, or purchasing necessary medical equipment before the year ends. Remember that medical expenses are only deductible in the year they are paid, so timing matters.

3. Make deductible charitable contributions

Making charitable donations can reduce your taxable income while supporting causes that matter to you.

If you itemize deductions on your federal income tax return, you can generally deduct charitable contributions, but the deduction is limited to 60%, 50%, 30%, or 20% of your adjusted gross income, depending on the type of property you give and the type of organization to which you contribute. Excess amounts can be carried over for up to five years.

You can use checks or credit cards to make year-end contributions even if the check does not clear until shortly after year-end or the credit card bill does not have to be paid until next year.

As you consider year-end charitable giving, there are a few strategies to keep in mind:

  • Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs): If you’re 70½ or older, you can direct up to $105,000 (2024 limit) from your IRA to a charity as a QCD. This donation counts toward your required minimum distribution (RMD) and is excluded from your taxable income (and can reduce the taxation of social security income.) QCDs cannot be counted as deductible charitable donations.
  • Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs): DAFs allow you to make a significant charitable contribution in 2024 and receive the tax deduction now while deciding which charities to support over the next several years. This is a strategy to help with the bunching of itemized deductions described earlier.
  • Appreciated Stock Donations: Donating appreciated stocks that have been held for over one year instead of cash generally provides a double benefit. It allows you to avoid paying capital gains tax on the appreciation while receiving a charitable deduction equal to the investment’s fair market value.

4. Bump up withholding to cover a tax shortfall

If it looks as though you will owe federal income tax for the year, consider increasing your withholding on Form W-4 for the remainder of the year to cover the shortfall. Time may be limited for employees to request a Form W-4 change and for their employers to implement it in 2024.

The most significant advantage in doing so is that withholding is considered to have been paid evenly throughout the year instead of when the dollars are taken from your paycheck. This approach can help you avoid or reduce possible underpayment of estimated tax penalties.

Those taking distributions from their IRAs can also request that up to 100% of the distribution be paid toward federal and state income tax withholding to help avoid underpayment of estimated tax penalties.

These increased withholding strategies can compensate for low or missing quarterly estimated tax payments.

5. Save more for retirement

Deductible contributions to a traditional IRA and pretax contributions to an employer-sponsored retirement plan such as a 401(k) can reduce your 2024 taxable income. Consider doing so if you still need to contribute up to the maximum amount allowed.

For 2024, you can contribute up to $23,000 to a 401(k) plan ($30,500 if you’re age 50 or older) and up to $7,000 to traditional and Roth IRAs combined ($8,000 if you’re age 50 or older). The window to make 2024 employee contributions to an employer plan generally closes at the end of the year, while you have until April 15, 2025, to make 2024 IRA contributions.

Various income limitations exist for eligibility to make traditional and Roth IRA contributions. Regardless of your income, however, you can make a non-deductible IRA contribution. Such a contribution can be subsequently converted to a Roth IRA at little or no tax cost for many (this is known by many as the “back-door” Roth.) If a Roth IRA conversion doesn’t make sense, the non-deductible contribution adds cost basis to your traditional IRA, reducing future taxation of IRA distributions or Roth conversions. Note that Roth contributions are not deductible and Roth-qualified distributions are not taxable.

Speaking of Roth Conversions, if you expect your tax rate to be higher in future years, or you’re in a low tax bracket in 2024, converting some or all your traditional (pre-tax) IRA or 401(k) funds into a Roth IRA in 2024 may be beneficial. While this conversion triggers taxes now, it can reduce future tax liabilities, as qualified withdrawals from a Roth IRA are tax-free.

Owners of small businesses with retirement plans may have until the due date of their tax returns (plus extensions) to make some retirement plan contributions. Check with your tax advisor for your particular small-business retirement plan.

Some small business retirement plans must be set up by 12/31/2024 to allow for a deduction for the 2024 tax year.

If you have a small business, check with your tax advisor to ensure your retirement plan deductions are correctly balanced with the qualified business income deduction, assuming your small business is eligible.

6. Take required minimum distributions

If you are 73 or older, you generally must take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from traditional IRAs and employer-sponsored retirement plans (special rules may apply if you’re still working and participating in your employer’s retirement plan.)

If you reach 73 in 2024, you must begin taking minimum distributions from your retirement accounts (traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, etc.) by April 1, 2025. However, delaying the 2024 RMD until 2025 will require you to include both the 2024 and 2025 RMDs into 2025 income.

You must make the withdrawals by the required date—the end of the year for most individuals. The penalty for failing to do so is substantial: 25% of any amount you failed to distribute as required (10% if corrected promptly).

In 2024, the IRS finalized somewhat complicated regulations relating to RMDs from inherited IRAs after December 31, 2019.

In general, under the SECURE Act, unless an exception applies, the entire balance of a traditional or Roth IRA must be fully distributed by the end of the 10th year after the year of death.

In addition, depending on the age of the original IRA owner, heirs must take an RMD every year until the 10th year, when the remaining account balance must be distributed. These rules require careful and sometimes complex, multi-year planning for large inherited IRAs, so it’s essential to consult your tax advisor.

Review your accounts to ensure you’ve met your RMD requirement for the year, and if applicable, consider making charitable contributions through a QCD.

7. Weigh year-end investment moves

I often tell folks, “You should not let the tax tail wag the investment dog.” That means that you shouldn’t let tax considerations drive your investment decisions.

With that in mind, lower-income taxpayers may be subject to a 0% long-term capital gains rate for up to about $47K of taxable income for single filers and $94K for joint filers. For “kids” under 26, up to $2,600 of long-term capital gains are taxed at 0% if filed on their own tax returns (not filed with parents’ returns.)

Regardless, it’s worth considering the tax implications of any year-end investment moves that you make. For example, if you have realized net capital gains from selling securities at a profit, you might avoid being taxed on some or all those gains by selling losing positions (also known as tax loss harvesting.)

Any capital losses over and above your capital gains can offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income ($1,500 if your filing status is married filing separately) or be carried forward to reduce your taxes in future years.

Wash sale rules prevent investors from selling an investment at a loss and re-purchasing the same or substantially similar security within 30 days in any of their or spouse’s accounts (including retirement accounts). Doing so invalidates the loss for the current year, and the loss deduction is suspended until the new security is ultimately sold. If you wait 31 days to repurchase the same (or substantially similar security), the wash sale rules do not apply.

Digital assets like Bitcoin are not subject to wash sales rules, so there’s no harm in harvesting a loss and then immediately re-purchasing the same digital asset if desired.

8. Contribute to 529 Education Savings Plans

If you’re planning to save for education expenses, the end of the year is an excellent time to consider contributions to a 529 education savings plan. There is no federal tax deduction for 529 plan contributions, but the account grows tax-free if the funds are used for qualifying educational purposes.

Many states offer a limited tax deduction or credit for 529 plan contributions (some states even allow for a deduction for a 529 plan rollover from another state’s 529 plan.) In many states, contributing to a 529 plan you don’t own (say for a sibling, grandkid, nephew, niece, cousin, or friend) also allows for a state tax deduction.

There’s a five-year “super-funding” strategy for those needing to accelerate their college funding. This strategy allows you to contribute up to five years’ worth of gifts to a 529 plan in a year ($90,000 for individuals, $180,000 for married couples). A gift tax return must be filed, but it may not be taxable if this is the only gift made to that person in the current year. This can be a great way to accelerate your child’s education savings.

With the ability to 1) fund private K-12 education, 2) repay some student loans up to $10,000, and 3) rollover some leftover 529 plan funds to a Roth IRA after college graduation, worries about overfunding a 529 education savings plan are far less than they used to be.

In summary, year-end tax planning is a valuable opportunity to control your finances and reduce your taxable income for the year. Reviewing your financial situation, consulting with your tax advisor, and implementing these year-end strategies will ensure that you enter 2025 knowing you’ve made proactive decisions to optimize your tax savings.

Don’t hesitate to contact us if you would like to discuss a tax plan that fully utilizes all available strategies.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first. If you are not a client, an initial consultation is complimentary, and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client and your financial plan and investment objectives are different.

Posted in General, investing, IRA, markets, tax planning, Taxes. Tags: , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

Are Interest Rates Signaling a Recession?

January 31, 2023 — Sam H. Fawaz

According to Investopedia, the yield curve shows the relationship between bond yields (the interest rates on the vertical axis) and bond maturity (the time on the horizontal axis).

Long-term bonds generally provide higher yields than short-term bonds because investors demand higher returns to compensate for the risk of lending money over an extended period. Occasionally, however, this relationship flips, and investors are willing to accept lower yields in return for the relative safety of longer-term bonds. This is called a yield curve inversion because a graph showing bond yields in relation to maturity is essentially turned upside down.

Imagine going to the bank and being told that a 1-year certificate of deposit yields 4.0%, but the 5-year CD only yields 3.0%. Few people would lock up their money for five times as long and earn a lower rate. This is an example of a yield inversion.

A yield curve could also apply to any bonds that carry similar risk, but the most studied curve is for U.S. Treasury securities, and the most common focal point is the relationship between the two-year and 10-year Treasury notes. Although Treasuries are often referred to as bonds, maturities up to one year are called bills, while maturities of two to 10 years are called notes. Only 20- and 30-year Treasuries are officially called bonds.

The two-year yield has been higher than the 10-year yield since July 2022, and beginning in late November, the difference has been at levels not seen since 1981. The biggest separation in 2022 came on December 7, when the two-year was 4.26%, and the 10-year was 3.42%, a difference of 0.84%. Other short-term Treasuries have also offered higher yields;  the highest yields in early 2023 were for the six-month and one-year Treasury bills. (1) 

Predicting Recessions

An inversion of the two-year and ten-year Treasury notes has preceded each recession over the past 50 years, reliably predicting a recession within the next one to two years. (2)  A 2018 Federal Reserve study suggested that an inversion of the three-month and ten-year Treasuries may be an even more reliable indicator, predicting a recession within about 12 months. (3) The three-month and ten-year Treasuries have been inverted since late October 2022, and in December 2022 and early January 2023, the difference was often greater than the inversion of the two- and 10-year notes. (4)

Weakness or Inflation Control?

Yield curve inversions do not cause a recession; rather they indicate a shift in investor sentiment that may reflect underlying economic weakness. A normal yield curve suggests investors believe the economy will continue to grow and interest rates will likely rise with the growth. In this scenario, an investor typically would want a premium to tie up capital in long-term bonds and potentially miss out on other opportunities in the future.

Conversely, an inversion suggests that investors see economic challenges that are likely to push interest rates down and typically would instead invest and lock in longer-term bonds at today’s yields. This increases demand for long-term bonds, driving prices up and yields down.

Note that bond prices and yields move in opposite directions; the more you pay for a bond that pays a given coupon interest rate, the lower the yield will be, and vice-versa.

The current situation is not so simple. The Federal Reserve has rapidly raised the benchmark federal funds rate (short-term) to combat inflation, increasing it from near 0% in March 2022 to 4.50%–4.75% today. The fed funds rate is the rate charged for overnight loans within the Federal Reserve System.  The funds rate directly affects other short-term rates, which is why yields on short-term Treasuries have increased rapidly. The fact that 10-year Treasuries have lagged the increase in the federal funds rate may mean that investors believe a recession is coming. But it could also reflect the confidence that the Fed is winning the battle against inflation and will lower rates over the next few years. This is in line with the Federal Reserve’s (The Fed) projections, which see the funds rate peaking at 5.0%–5.25% by the end of 2023 and then dropping to 4.0%–4.25% in 2024 and 3.0%–3.25% in 2025. (5)

Inflation has been slowing somewhat in October-December, but there is a long way to go to reach the Fed’s target of 2% inflation for a healthy economy. (6)  The fundamental question remains the same as it has been since the Fed launched its aggressive rate increases: Will it require a recession to control inflation, or can it be controlled without shifting the economy into reverse?

Other Indicators and Forecasts

The yield curve is one of many indicators that economists consider when making economic projections. Among the most closely watched are the ten leading economic indicators published by the Conference Board, with data on employment, interest rates, manufacturing, stock prices, housing, and consumer sentiment. The Leading Economic Index, which includes all ten indicators, fell for nine consecutive months through November 2022. Conference Board economists predict a recession beginning around the end of 2022 and lasting until mid-2023. (7) Recessions are not officially declared by the National Bureau of Economic Research until they are underway. The Conference Board view would suggest the United States may already be in a recession.

In The Wall Street Journal’s October 2022 Economic Forecasting Survey, most economists believed the United States would enter a recession within the next 12 months, with an average expectation of a relatively mild 8-month downturn. (8) More recent surveys of economists for the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and Wolters Kluwer Blue Chip Economic Indicators also found a consensus for a mild recession in 2023. (9)

For now, the economy appears strong despite high inflation, with a low December 2022 unemployment rate of 3.5% and an estimated 2.9% 4th quarter growth rate for real gross domestic product (GDP). Nonetheless, the indicators and surveys discussed above suggest an economic downturn in the next year or so. This would likely cause some job losses and other temporary financial hardship, but a brief recession may be the necessary price to tame inflation and put the U.S. economy on a more stable track for future growth.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch. We start with a specific assessment of your personal situation. There is no rush and no cookie-cutter approach. Each client is different, and so are your financial plan and investment objectives.

(1), (4) U.S. Treasury, 2023

(2)  Financial Times, December 7, 2022

(3) Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, August 27, 2018

(5) Federal Reserve, 2022

(6) U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022

(7)  The Conference Board, December 22, 2022

(8) The Wall Street Journal, October 16, 2022

(9) SIFMA, December 2022

Posted in American Economy, bonds, economy, investing, markets. Tags: , , . Leave a Comment »

Is America in Decline?

March 7, 2015 — Sam H. Fawaz

In 1945, the U.S. made up more than half of the world’s total gross domestic product (GDP), which basically means that half the world’s economy took place inside U.S. borders. Today that figure is just under 22%.

Does that mean America is in decline?

There seems to be a bull market in doomsayers these past few years, as we’re all reading arguments that the U.S. is slowly losing its grip on global preeminence. The rhetoric today sounds a lot like the hand-wringing back in the 1980s when Japan was allegedly taking over the global economy, and before that, when the Soviet Union had more missiles and a Sputnik circling over our heads.

There’s no easy way to define the overall quality of an economy, but probably the most thorough assessment comes out each year via the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Rankings. The most recent report ranked 144 countries around the world, including Qatar (16), Moldavia (82), Namibia (88), Lesotho (107) and the unhappy states of Chad (143) and Guinea (144), whose citizens eke out their lives on per capita incomes of $1,218 and $564 a year, respectively.

The survey looks at 12 “pillars” of economic competitiveness, including labor market efficiency, the quality of primary education and higher education, infrastructure, the strength of institutions, innovation, business sophistication, technological readiness and the sophistication of the financial markets. Each of these categories are broken down into dozens of subcategories, which are separately evaluated. For instance, when looking at the strength of each country’s public institutions, the World Economic Forum researchers consider whether people in a given country have strong property rights and intellectual property protection, whether there is corruption and the routine payment of bribes, whether the citizens enjoy judicial independence and a solid legal framework, and how well investors enjoy shareholder protection.

In the most recent survey, the U.S. ranked third overall, with an overall rating of 5.5 on a scale of 1-6. Ahead of it were Switzerland (5.7) and Singapore (5.6). China, the country that you most often hear cited as the all-powerful up-and-coming economy, ranked 28th, two rungs below Saudi Arabia, one rung above Estonia. Brazil and India, which are sometimes mentioned as powerful competitors to U.S. economic hegemony, are ranked 57th and 71st, respectively.

The point of the rankings is to show which countries have created the healthiest (or, in the cases of Chad and Guinea, the least-healthy) economic climate for future growth. But of course there are other ways of measuring competitiveness, including the bottom line (as mentioned at the top of the article) of percentage of the world GDP, and whether you’re moving up or down.

US and Global GDP through 2014

By that standard, the U.S. is indeed moving down. If you look at Figure 1 above, which shows the size of the overall global and U.S. economies since 1991, you see that the U.S. has enjoyed steady economic growth, while the world at large has essentially taken off like a rocket. The years following the collapse of the Soviet Union, when several billion people were suddenly allowed to become capitalists, have been good for world growth. When China shifted from a communist to a capitalist economic posture, this added fuel to the rocket. The democratization of computer technology and the global Internet has empowered value creators everywhere.

The U.S., Europe and Japan, in other words, no longer have a monopoly on capitalism. And that’s a good thing.

Is there a better way of evaluating how the U.S. economy is holding up in an increasingly competitive world? Figure 2 below looks at the first chart from a slightly different angle. Since 1991, what percentage of all the world’s business has been happening in the U.S., vs. Europe, Japan, China, India, Russia and Brazil?   How much of the total global economy did each nation claim in each year, and how has that balance changed over time?

US GDP Market Share through 2014

What you see there is that the U.S. is still in the lead by a pretty wide margin, and in recent years has actually stabilized its percentage of total global GDP. The decline has come mostly because a lot of smaller emerging markets, plus China and, to a certain extent, Brazil, India and Russia, have all been growing. At the same time, America’s traditional competitors—Europe and Japan—have been sinking. If you want to point a finger at decline, perhaps that’s a better direction than the U.S.

Does the U.S. face economic challenges? Of course. Is our political system a mess? Sure. Could things be better? Certainly. But if you sift through a lot of variables with a fine-toothed comb, you discover that the U.S. has created a better environment to grow and prosper than almost anywhere else, and it has held its own with the roaring growth of the emerging markets while the other developed nations are losing ground. More than a fifth of all economic activity still happens in the U.S., and the long, slow decline in that figure is not due to stagnation at home, but abundant growth all around the world. That’s not something to worry about; it’s something we should be celebrating.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Sources:

http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2014-2015/rankings/

http://www.economywatch.com/economic-statistics/year/1990/

http://theamericanscene.com/2008/05/07/a-post-american-world

TheMoneyGeek thanks guest writer Bob Veres for writing this post.

Posted in American Economy, Financial Planning, General, markets, retirement planning. Tags: , . Leave a Comment »

The Psychology of Investing: How We Cope With Risk

February 8, 2015 — Sam H. Fawaz

Researchers have found that investors have a tendency to psychologically exaggerate declines in the performance of an investment and to minimize gains. It’s a phenomenon with a complex sounding name — “myopic loss aversion” — but also one that makes a simple point: Psychology plays a role in our investment decisions. Understanding that role, the subject of this second installment of a three-part series on investment risk, may help you stay on course toward your long-term financial objectives.

Word Play

Individuals subconsciously “frame” expectations based upon how the information is presented to them. For instance, would you prefer to invest in a security that has a 40% chance of yielding negative returns or one that has a 60% chance of yielding positive returns? Many people would choose the latter, even though the same investment opportunity was offered in both cases.

Running With the Pack

It’s human nature to want to choose investments that have performed well. On the other hand, many of us are naturally risk-averse. Sometimes these inclinations combine to make us less effective investors. For instance, do you know people who wait to invest until they hear of a security that consistently produces above-average returns? Then, sensing a “safe bet,” they purchase this investment — often when it’s at peak value. If the investment drops in value, they move their money to what they perceive as a less risky security or even pull out of the market altogether — even if such a move clashes with their long-term goals.

This sort of short-term thinking creates risk, too. When investors move in and out of the market, they’re practicing an investment tactic known as market timing. The risk is that they’ll mistime the market and lose out on potential gains. Even professional portfolio managers admit that it can be difficult to predict market moves.

Personal Experiences and Our Portfolios

Research has shown that individuals who grew up during the Great Depression are more likely to invest conservatively, while those who entered the market during the mid-1990s expect high returns and tend to invest more aggressively. Being aware of how past experience may influence your perceptions, can help you avoid financial strategies that may work against you.

So What Can You Do?

Several strategies may help you minimize the role that emotions and psychological tendencies play in your investment decisions. Stay focused on your long-term goals and not the market’s short-term moves. And rather than reviewing your investments’ performance every week, consider scheduling quarterly or semi annual portfolio reviews with a qualified financial professional.

Finally, develop — and stick to — a well thought out plan that’s based on your goals and your personal tolerance for risk. Look for more on these and other strategies that may help you cope with risk in the final installment of this series.

If you would like to review your current investment portfolio or discuss any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Posted in Financial Planning, markets, retirement planning. Tags: , , . Leave a Comment »

The Swiss Franc and Your Portfolio

January 21, 2015 — Sam H. Fawaz

You’ve almost certainly read about the recent drop in the global (and U.S.) stock markets, as a result of the “shocking” announcement by the Swiss central banking authority that it would not force the Swiss franc to trade at 1.2 euros.  Be prepared to be shocked: you can now buy a Swiss franc with a euro.

If you’re like most of us, you’ve probably wondered why this shocking development would have anything to do with the enterprise value of the individual companies that make up the various global indices.  What’s the story here?

The story is actually pretty simple—and surprisingly, isn’t being told very clearly in the press.  The Swiss National Bank had been artificially holding the Swiss franc at 1.2 euros for the past three years.  Why?  Because the value of the euro has been sinking on global markets.  A lower euro means everything manufactured in the Eurozone is less expensive for outside buyers, which is great for exports. By keeping the franc at a steady cost vs. the euro, the Swiss National Bank was protecting Swiss watches, chocolate products and high-end medical diagnostic equipment from becoming more expensive in the countries where Switzerland does most of its export business.

This policy suddenly became more difficult, in part because the European Central bank is expected to announce, on Thursday January 22, what economists delicately call “monetary easing”—buying government bonds, lowering interest rates, and giving banks and corporations more access to more euros.  The inevitable result would be a lower euro compared to other currencies.  Every time the Swiss Central Bank buys euros and sells francs, it is putting money in the pockets of global currency traders and a variety of hot money speculators who have bet that the Swiss will continue their policy.  These traders would have reaped a huge windfall if the euro dropped and the bank continued to fight an increasingly expensive battle to maintain parity.  The effect would have been a transfer of billions of dollars from Swiss taxpayers to shady speculators.

But why does any of this affect the value of U.S. stocks, or stocks in Europe, for that matter?  Why were floor traders on the New York Stock Exchange experiencing what one described as ‘once-in-a-career’ market turbulence, and others described as a ‘massive flight to safety?’  Certain exporting companies in Switzerland will be negatively affected and have to adjust their profit margins downward to stay competitive.  But U.S. companies aren’t selling their goods and services abroad in Swiss francs, and European companies will be slightly more competitive, globally, after the expected monetary easing announcement.

The only answer that makes any sense is that hot money traders dislike any kind of surprises, and they hit the “sell” button whenever they’re startled by news that they didn’t anticipate.  Then they wait until they have a better understanding of what’s going on.  And, since these short-term traders make up a majority of all the actual buys and sells, the markets tend to trade lower even though no fundamental economic reason exists for them to.

This provides a great opportunity for all of us to see the difference between short-term headline moves in the market and long-term fundamental shifts.  Make a note to, a month from now, see if you still remember the fact that the Swiss central bank is no longer supporting the franc against the euro.  At the same time, look to see if any major shift has occurred in the business operations or profitability of U.S. companies due to this adjustment in currency values overseas.

There will be known and unknown consequences as a result of this action.  Other countries may decide to manipulate their currencies as well.  Over the coming months, you might have to pay a little more for a Swiss watch, and chocolate manufactured in Switzerland might be pricier as well.  You will want to steer clear of parking your money in the Swiss central banking system, which is now paying an interest rate of negative three quarters of a percent.  If you’re a global options trader who took the wrong side of the bet, this was terrible news for your returns this year.  But the underlying value of the stocks in a diversified investment portfolio aren’t likely to become less valuable based on the latest trading price of options denominated in Swiss francs.

If you would like to discuss your portfolio or any financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Sources:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/marcelmichelson/2015/01/16/swiss-franc-u-turn-is-realistic-move-as-snb-cannot-stop-tide/

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2015-01-15/swiss-franc-surges-to-record-high-against-euro-as-snb-ends-cap

http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/15/investing/interest-rates-negative-switzerland-ecb/index.html

Posted in Fee-only, Financial Planning, General, investing, markets, retirement planning. Tags: , , , . Leave a Comment »

2014 Investment Report: Dare to Believe?

January 4, 2015 — Sam H. Fawaz

Looking back on 2014, people are going to say it was a great year to be an investor. They won’t remember how uncertain the journey felt right up to the last day of a year that saw the S&P 500 close at a record level on 53 different days. Think back over a good year in the market. Was there ever a time when you felt confidently bullish that the markets were taking off and delivering double-digit returns? I know I didn’t.

The Wilshire 5000–the broadest measure of U.S. stocks and bonds—finished the year up 13.14%, on the basis of a strong 5.88% return in the final three months of the year. The comparable Russell 3000 index will go into the history books gaining 12.56% in 2014.

The Wilshire U.S. Large Cap index gained 14.62% in 2014, with 6.06% of that coming in the final quarter. The Russell 1000 large-cap index gained 13.24%, while the widely-quoted S&P 500 index of large company stocks posted a gain of 4.39% in the final quarter of the year, to finish up 11.39%. The index completed its sixth consecutive year in positive territory, although this was the second-weakest yearly gain since the 2008 market meltdown.

The Wilshire U.S. Mid-Cap index gained a flat 10% in 2014, with a 5.77% return in the final quarter of the year. The Russell Midcap Index gained 13.22% in 2014.

Small company stocks, as measured by the Wilshire U.S. Small-Cap, gave investors a 7.66% return, all of it (and more) coming from a strong 8.57% gain in the final three months of the year. The comparable Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index was up 4.89% for the year. Meanwhile, the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index gained 14.39% for the year.

While the U.S. economy and markets were delivering double-digit returns, the international markets were more subdued. The broad-based EAFE index of companies in developed economies lost 7.35% in dollar terms in 2014, in large part because European stocks declined 9.55%. Emerging markets stocks of less developed countries, as represented by the EAFE EM index, fared better, but still lost 4.63% for the year. Outside the U.S., the countries that saw the largest stock market rises included Argentina (up 57%), China (up 52%), India (up 29.8%) and Japan (up 7.1%).

Looking over the other investment categories, real estate investments, as measured by the Wilshire U.S. REIT index, was up a robust 33.95% for the year, with 17.03% gains in the final quarter alone. Commodities, as measured by the S&P GSCI index, proved to be an enormous drag on investment portfolios, losing 33.06% of their value, largely because of steep recent drops in gold and oil prices.

Part of the reason that U.S. stocks performed so well when investors seemed to be constantly looking over their shoulders is interest rates—specifically, the fact that interest rates remained stubbornly low, aided, in no small part, by a Federal Reserve that seems determined not to let the markets dictate bond yields until the economy is firmly and definitively on its feet. The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index now has an effective yield of 3.13%, giving its investors a windfall return of 7.27% for the year due to falling bond rates. 30-year Treasuries are yielding 2.75%, and 10-year Treasuries currently yield 2.17%. At the low end, 3-month T-bills are still yielding a miniscule 0.04%; 6-month bills are only slightly more generous, at 0.12%.

Normally when the U.S. investment markets have posted six consecutive years of gains, five of them in double-digit territory, you would expect to see a kind of euphoria sweep through the ranks of investors. But for most of 2014, investors in aggregate seemed to vacillate between caution and fear, hanging on every economic and jobs report, paying close attention to the Federal Reserve Board’s pronouncements, seemingly trying to find the bad news in the long, steady economic recovery.

One of the most interesting aspects of 2014—and, indeed, the entire U.S. bull market period since 2009—is that so many people think portfolio diversification was a bad thing for their wealth. When global stocks are down compared with the U.S. markets, U.S. investors tend to look at their statements and wonder why they’re lagging the S&P index that they see on the nightly news. This year, commodity-related investments were also down significantly, producing even more drag during what was otherwise a good investment year.

But that’s the point of diversification: when the year began, none of us knew whether the U.S., Europe, both or neither would finish the year in positive territory. Holding some of each is a prudent strategy, yet the eye inevitably turns to the declining investment which, in hindsight, pulled the overall returns down a bit. At the end of next year, we may be looking at U.S. stocks with the same gimlet eye and feeling grateful that we were invested in global stocks as a way to contain the damage; there’s no way to know in advance. Indeed, we increased our allocations to overseas markets in 2014 as a matter of prudent re-balancing.  For 2014, that proved to be a tad early, providing a bit of a headwind.

Is a decline in U.S. stocks likely? One can never predict these things in advance, but the usual recipe for a terrible market year is a period right beforehand when investors finally throw caution to the winds, and those who never joined the bull market run decide it’s time to crash the party. The markets have a habit of punishing overconfidence and latecomers, but we don’t seem to be seeing that quite yet.

What we ARE seeing is kind of boring: a long, slow economic recovery in the U.S., a slow housing recovery, healthy but not spectacular job creation in the U.S., stagnation and fears of another Greek default in Europe, stocks trading at values slightly higher than historical norms and a Fed policy that seems to be waiting for certainty or a sign from above that the recovery will survive a return to normal interest rates.

On the plus side, we also saw a 46% decline in crude oil prices, saving U.S. drivers approximately $14 billion this year. On the minus side, investments in the energy sector during 2014 proved be a downer to portfolios. Oil, like most commodities, tends to be cyclical, and should turn back upward should the rest of the world find its footing and show healthier signs of growth. Should crude continue to slide, we may see collateral damage in the form of lost jobs, shuttered drilling projects and loan defaults by independent, not so well capitalized producers. This would be your classic case of “too much of a good thing.”

The Fed has signaled that it plans to take its foot off of interest rates sometime in the middle of 2015. The questions that nobody can answer are important ones: Will the recovery gain steam and make stocks more valuable in the year ahead? Will Europe stabilize and ultimately recover, raising the value of European stocks? Will oil prices stabilize and remain low, giving a continuing boost to the economy? Or will, contrary to long history, the markets flop without any kind of a euphoric top?

We can’t answer any of these questions, of course. What we do know is that since 1958, the U.S. markets, as measured by the S&P 500 index, have been up 53% of all trading days, 58% of all months, 63% of all quarters and 72% of the years. Over 10-year rolling time periods, the markets have been up 88% of the time. These figures do not include the value of the dividends that investors were paid for hanging onto their stock investments during each of the time periods.

Yet since 1875, the S&P 500 has never risen for seven calendar years in a row. Could 2015 break that streak? Stay tuned.

Sources:

Wilshire index data: http://www.wilshire.com/Indexes/calculator/

Russell index data: http://www.russell.com/indexes/data/daily_total_returns_us.asp

S&P index data: http://www.standardandpoors.com/indices/sp-500/en/us/?indexId=spusa-500-usduf–p-us-l–

http://money.cnn.com/2014/09/30/investing/stocks-market-september-slump/index.html

Nasdaq index data: http://quicktake.morningstar.com/Index/IndexCharts.aspx?Symbol=COMP

International indices: http://www.mscibarra.com/products/indices/international_equity_indices/performance.html

Commodities index data: http://us.spindices.com/index-family/commodities/sp-gsci

Treasury market rates: http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us/

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/06/30/one-chart-explains-the-unexpected-first-half-treasury-rally/

Aggregate corporate bond rates: https://indices.barcap.com/show?url=Benchmark_Indices/Aggregate/Bond_Indices

Aggregate corporate bond rates: http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/corporate-bonds/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/31/us-usa-markets-2015-analysis-idUSKBN0K908820141231

http://moneyover55.about.com/od/howtoinvest/a/bearmarkets.htm?utm_term=historical%20performance%20of%20s&p%20500&utm_content=p1-main-7-title&utm_medium=sem&utm_source=msn&utm_campaign=adid-ac372107-3fb5-4c61-a1f3-6ab4e1340551-0-ab_msb_ocode-28813&ad=semD&an=msn_s&am=broad&q=historical%20performance%20of%20s&p%20500&dqi=S%2526P%2520500%2520yearly%2520performance&o=28813&l=sem&qsrc=999&askid=ac372107-3fb5-4c61-a1f3-6ab4e1340551-0-ab_msb

Posted in Financial Planning, General, investing, markets, retirement, retirement planning. Tags: , , , , . Leave a Comment »

As Inflation Fears Fade, Deflation Moves Front and Center

December 31, 2014 — Sam H. Fawaz

As the Federal Reserve winds down its massive bond-buying program, the widely predicted after effects — rising interest rates and inflation — have thus far failed to materialize. The yield on the bond market’s bellwether 10-year Treasury note, which started 2014 at 3.03%, had fallen to 2.33% as of October 29.1 Similarly, inflation, as measured by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics key benchmark, the Consumer Price Index, has risen just 1.7% in the past year and has averaged 1.6% since the Fed first initiated its bond-buying program four years ago.2

Currently, concerns over inflation have been replaced by an opposite economic condition: deflation, defined as two quarters of falling prices within a 12-month period.3

Deflation, a Good News/Bad News Story

The paradox of deflation is that it can create good as well as bad conditions. When prices on essential goods and services drop, consumers are left with more disposable income to spend on nonessential items. Case in point: Plunging oil prices have spelled relief at the pumps, as the average national price for gas has now dropped below $3.00 a gallon for the first time since 2010.4

But when prices tend to fall across the board, the effect can turn negative for the economy, companies, and governments alike. Consumers put off making major purchases in the hope that prices will fall even further. That purchasing stalemate can be disastrous for a consumer-driven economy like the United States’, which garners about 70% of its GDP from consumer spending.

When spending stalls, companies’ revenues suffer and pressure mounts to cut costs by laying off workers, freezing or reducing wages, or raising the price of the goods they produce — all of which can further stymie consumer spending and deepen the deflationary cycle.

Debt is the other major problem associated with deflation. On the consumer side, when wages are stagnant or declining, consumer spending power declines, and it becomes more difficult to pay off debts — even fixed-rate debt such as home mortgages — because the value of that debt relative to income increases.

The same scenario plays out for corporations and governments, causing cash-flow shortages, tax revenue shortfalls, liquidity problems, and even bankruptcy.5 Deflation fears are particularly pronounced in Europe, where sluggish economic growth has much of the continent teetering on the brink of recession. To a lesser extent Japan and China are facing similar woes.

On the Right Side of the Problem

The good news/bad news nature of deflation has everything to do with what is driving the drop in prices of goods and services. For instance, if it is a lack of demand — as many economists say is currently the case in the Eurozone — deflation could be damaging. If, however, it is due to a boost in supply — such as the oil and gas boom in the United States — it can prove beneficial to economic growth.6

Either way, analysts say that U.S. investors should benefit from current conditions for the time being. The S&P 500 Index has gained 6.3% thus far this year (as of October 26), while the Stoxx Europe 600 Index has fallen 0.3%. Meanwhile, virtually all major currencies are devaluing against the dollar in an attempt to export deflation to the United States.6

If you would like to discuss your current portfolio asset allocation or any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

I wish you great health and prosperity in 2015!

 

Sources:

1USA Today, “First Take: Beginning of the end of easy money,” October 29, 2014.

2U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, September 2014.

3The Economist, “The dangers of deflation: The pendulum swings to the pit,” October 25, 2014.

4AAA’s Fuel Gauge Report, November 3, 2014.

5Yahoo Finance, “Why deflation is so scary,” November 3, 2014.

6Bloomberg, “U.S. Gains From Good Deflation as Europe Faces the Bad Kind,” October 26, 2014.

Posted in Fee-only, Financial Planning, General, investing, markets, retirement planning. Tags: , , , . Leave a Comment »

Is Your Portfolio “In Style” or Making a Bad Fashion Statement?

December 24, 2014 — Sam H. Fawaz

It is fairly common knowledge that a retirement portfolio’s carefully constructed asset allocation can become unbalanced in two cases: When you alter your investment strategy and when market performance causes the value of some funds in your portfolio to rise or fall more dramatically than others. But did you know there is also a third scenario? Your portfolio can become unbalanced due to unexpected changes in the funds’ holdings.

Getting the Drift

The phenomenon known as “style drift” generally occurs when a fund’s manager or management team strays beyond the parameters of the fund’s stated objective in pursuit of better returns. For example, this may occur when a growth fund begins investing significantly in value stocks or when a large-company fund begins investing in the stocks of small and midsized companies. As a result, the fund’s name may not accurately reflect its strategy.

If style drift occurs within the funds held in your portfolio, it could alter your overall risk and return potential, which may influence your ability to effectively pursue your financial goals.

Feeling the Effects

While some fund managers embrace a strategy that provides significant flexibility to help boost returns, and indeed such flexibility often proves quite successful, investors need to remember that too much flexibility can also present a threat to their own portfolio’s level of diversification. Investors need to consider their ability to tolerate unexpected changes in pursuit of higher returns.

For example, let us assume an investor allocates her equity investments equally between growth funds and value funds with the hope of managing risk and increasing exposure to different types of opportunities. If the manager of the growth fund begins to invest heavily in value stocks, the investor could end up owning two funds with very similar characteristics and a much greater level of risk than she intended.

Truth in Labeling?

Although most investment companies, including those represented in your retirement plan, adhere to stringent fund management standards, you may not want to simply judge a book by its cover, so to speak. An occasional portfolio review can help ensure that you remain comfortable with each fund’s management strategy.

For a comprehensive look at each fund and to evaluate its potential role in your portfolio, take the time to study its prospectus and annual report to determine how much flexibility the fund manager has in security selection. Also, look carefully at the fund’s holdings to see if they are in line with the stated objective. If you discover something that appears amiss, it may be appropriate to rebalance your portfolio accordingly.

If you would like to discuss your current portfolio asset allocation or any other financial planning matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us or visit our website at http://www.ydfs.com. We are a fee-only fiduciary financial planning firm that always puts your interests first.  If you are not a client yet, an initial consultation is complimentary and there is never any pressure or hidden sales pitch.

Have a Merry Christmas!

Posted in Fee-only, Financial Planning, General, investing, markets, retirement planning. Tags: , , , , , , . 1 Comment »
« Older posts